Notify Party Shows Limited I/O LTD

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
anantsharma
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 1:51 pm
First Name: Anant
Last Name: Sharma
Organization: Private
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: India

Notify Party Shows Limited I/O LTD

Post by anantsharma » Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:19 pm

Dear Friends,

In LC the Notify party states Maruti Global Ltd
and by mistake have accepted in BL Notify party as Maruti Global Limited.

Is this OK for presentation in Bank or will be a discrepancy?

Request expert comments from members of the forum.

Best Regards
Anant Sharma

mandeep
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:07 pm
First Name: mandeep
Last Name: maharjan
Organization: laxmi bank ltd
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: nepal

notify party issue

Post by mandeep » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:03 pm

Dear Anant,

'Limited' is just full form of 'Ltd'. so i think it won't be discrepancy.

regards
mandeep

sandeep_mt
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:13 am
First Name: sandeep
Last Name: mothkuri
Organization: axis bank ltd
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

limited

Post by sandeep_mt » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:41 pm

Dear Anantsharma

Refer isbp 745 para A1 its not a discrepancy .

vancie23
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:59 am
First Name: Vanita
Last Name: Bamania
Organization: NA
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: UAE

notify party issue

Post by vancie23 » Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:17 pm

As per ISBP:
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Abbreviations
6) The use of generally accepted abbreviations, for example “Ltd.” instead of “Limited”,
“Int’l” instead of “International”, “Co.” instead of “Company”, “kgs” or “kos.” instead
of “kilos”, “Ind” instead of “Industry”, “mfr” instead of “manufacturer” or “mt”
instead of “metric tons” – or vice versa – does not make a document discrepant.

UCP 600 : Article 14 : Standard for Examination of Documents
j. When the addresses of the beneficiary and the applicant appear in any stipulated document, they need
not be the same as those stated in the credit or in any other stipulated document, but must be within the
same country as the respective addresses mentioned in the credit. Contact details (telefax, telephone, email
and the like) stated as part of the beneficiary's and the applicant's address will be disregarded. However,
when the address and contact details of the applicant appear as part of the consignee or notify party details
on a transport document subject to articles 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25, they must be as stated in the
credit.

Hence the discrepancy is not valid

Post Reply