certificate of origin

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

certificate of origin

Post by dinesh2476 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:36 am

Dear Experts,

a .Regarding goods description is to appear in the certificate of origin, certificate of origin evidencing Invoice number/bil of lading number alone is enough to comply with ISBP paragraph ''content of a certificate of origin'' or specific wordings say ''Goods as per Invoice number/bill of lading shared herein'' , ''specific wordings connecting should appear to comply.

b. Regarding consignee information should not conflict with consignee information in the BL, when certificate of origin does not state '' to the order'' which is evidencing in BL as part of consignee information , makes document discrepant? though '' to order'' does not give any additional benefit under consignee,, need to hear opinion from the experts here

also provide the opinion for reason for having ''any party named in the credit'' under consignee. any issue happened to have add such condition in the ISBP.

Regards
Dinesh

snejiblajeva
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 1:38 pm
First Name: Snezhina
Last Name: Blazheva
Organization: Pupil's net
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bulgaria

Re: certificate of origin

Post by snejiblajeva » Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:26 pm

this is about the consignee from ISBP 754
Q9) Consignee information, when shown, is not to conflict with the consignee information in the transport document. However, when a credit requires a transport document to be issued "to order", "to the order of shipper", "to order of issuing bank", "to order of nominated bank (or negotiating bank)" or "consigned to issuing bank", a certificate may show the consignee as any entity named in the credit except the beneficiary. When a credit has been transferred, the first beneficiary may be stated to be the consignee.

dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

certificate of origin

Post by dinesh2476 » Fri May 31, 2019 11:55 pm

Dear Experts,

Any opinion welcome.

Thanks & Regards
Dinesh

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: certificate of origin

Post by cristiand969 » Sat Jun 01, 2019 12:26 am

Am opinion to what?

dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

Re: certificate of origin

Post by dinesh2476 » Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:48 pm

Dear cris,

Though Snezhina shared their comments, looking for precise comments for the below.

a .Regarding goods description is to appear in the certificate of origin, certificate of origin evidencing Invoice number/bil of lading number alone is enough to comply with ISBP paragraph ''content of a certificate of origin'' or specific wordings say ''Goods as per Invoice number/bill of lading shared herein'' , ''specific wordings connecting should appear to comply.

b. Regarding consignee information should not conflict with consignee information in the BL, when certificate of origin does not state '' to the order'' which is evidencing in BL as part of consignee information , makes document discrepant? though '' to order'' does not give any additional benefit under consignee,, need to hear opinion from the experts here

Thanks & Regards
Dinesh Kumar

Post Reply