Why Inland Water Waybill Does Not Require On Board Notation

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

Why Inland Water Waybill Does Not Require On Board Notation

Post by shahriar » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:29 pm

hello friends

why is that an inland water waybill does not require a on board notation?

regd

shahriar

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: on board

Post by cristiand969 » Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:58 pm

This document falling in a separate category than sea shipment 'on board' notation has been adapted accordingly to ' indicate the date the goods accepted for shipment,dispatch or carriage'.
Since English is not my native language, I can only assume that it may be an technical as well as a legal expression established in international sea transport of goods.
However ,Cambridge Dictionary give a definition of 'on board' as 'on a boat, train or aircraft'
Sorry I could'nt help you more.
regards
Cristian

jmitra
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:16 pm
First Name: jasmit
Last Name: mitra
Organization: bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: India

Re: on board

Post by jmitra » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:41 pm

here is a definition of on board that i found on a Bill of lading

"on board means goods are laden on board the ocean vessel named on the bill of lading or loaded on board rail car, truck, lorries, feeder ships, burges or other means of transportation"

Post Reply