Is Negotiation Equals To Bill Purchase?

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
ofei
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:51 am

Is Negotiation Equals To Bill Purchase?

Post by ofei » Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:42 am

Dear all,
I have two questions here .
1. Wheher negotiation equals to bill purchased. In china, most banking practioners take the two concepts as one.
2. If the negotiating bank fails to claims reimbursement from the issuing bank or reimbursing bank, he retains the right of recourse. But why doesn't UCP stipulate this?

Ofei

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: the right of recourse by negotiating bank

Post by cristiand969 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 9:06 pm

technically speaking and according to an ICC opinion previously posted by me here, a credit available by negotiation should not include any form that payment is to be obtained by claiming reimbursement as this structure is a credit available for payment.
Even so, why negotiating bank should come back for recourse towards beneficiary. Is the beneficiary obligation to claim reimbursement from issuing bank/third bank? I think the negotiating bank should admit its fault.
regards

ofei
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:51 am

Re: the right of recourse by negotiating bank

Post by ofei » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:37 am

Tks for your comment here.
But the very fact in china is that before negotiation, the beneficiary and the negotiating bank will sign an agreement, in which contains the clause----the negotiating bank has the right of recource if he fails to claim reimbursement from the issuing bank.
I just can reckon that it is out of the scope of UCP.

Regards

Ofei

Post Reply