Special Agreement Between Advising Bank And Issuing Bank

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

Special Agreement Between Advising Bank And Issuing Bank

Post by shahriar » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:36 pm

dear all,

i have read in a number of texts which says that advising bank may a change certain reimbursement clause if they have agreement with the issuing bank. i would like to know is the beneficiary bound by such instruction. besides how the beneficiary will be sure that whether the advising bank have especial agreement with the issuing bank or not?

regd

shahriar

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Re: How a beneficiary is suppose to know

Post by picant » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:42 am

Hi Pals,

reimboursing instructions are for the advising banks only and could not be communicate to beneficiary(see Standard documentary Credit forms -under UCP 500-broch. 516) Naturally an advising bank could ask the issuing bank to change those, specially if the advising bank run a current account with issuing bank . However it is a bad practice to send copy of SWIFT MT 700 to the beneficiary, without cancelling the reimbursement instructions, even if now freely available l/c are not limited to negotiation, but they are for payment, sight and deferred, and for acceptance too.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

Re: How a beneficiary is suppose to know

Post by iLC » Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:03 pm

important information from picant. thanks! need to look in it. but i found no reason to conceal the reimbursement instruction. in fact many important decision depends on it. besides similar question has been answered by ICC earlier. if reimbursement instruction is be concealed, ICC would have made that clear in the opinion. anyway, i never like the scenario where the advising bank may change any content of the original LC. if the issuing bank had to offer advising bank a privilege, its better to write the clauses in ways suitable to the advising bank during the drafting of the LC.

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: How a beneficiary is suppose to know

Post by cristiand969 » Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:28 pm

I consider a bad practice doing so as the beneficiary may decide to present himself documents to the issuing bank.
If the reimbursement clause bears some restrictions initiated by advising bank (which was not named in the query as a nominated bank) the said advising bank may face real problems. Pls bear in mind that a credit can neither be amended nor cancelled without the agreement of the issuing bank, confirming bank (if any) and beneficiary. The only role of the advising bank is to advise acuratelly what they have received and nothing more.
regards
Cristian

Post Reply