L/C for Raw Sugar

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
ghubshawi
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:51 pm

L/C for Raw Sugar

Post by ghubshawi » Wed Dec 31, 2008 4:55 pm

Good day to all,

I have been posting these Quires on Letter of Credit Forum as well.

Being as a buyer of Raw Sugar my supplier has requeted me to consider the following amendments among many others;

1- Stale documents are acceptable.

2- Documents bear date of issue prior to the L/C date are acceptable.

3- Only Commercial Invoice must bear L/C No.

4- Third Party documents are acceptable.

5- MT 47A ....you are authorised to effect payment within two working days ....

Your urgent comments are welcome hopefully within today.

Regards,

Ghubshawi

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

i see no problem

Post by iLC » Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:32 pm

considering the merchandise and related trade practice, i see no problem. the intention of the seller is very clear. the cargo is already shipped and heading towards the destination :) . however i think point 5 needs bit clarification

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

overall its ok

Post by shahriar » Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:13 pm

what are you so worried about dear Ghubshawi? all the terms are quite normal. i guess its for a bulk shipment.

1. you will accept shipping document older than 21 days or any other presentation period stated in the credit.
2. i think some documents have already been produced. UCP allows this. no harm

3. Since the documents have been produced already, the seller dont want to add the LC no. there; in fear of discrepancy i think. well even if it is added later, it wont be a discrepancy. and it wont be a discrepancy even if its not mentioned on the documents while the lc has asked for the lc no. to be shown on all documents. so i think there is no practical use of this clause.

4. in bulk commodity trade its very common that shipper and producer are some third party

5. and about this one. i really think you should consider the ISBP
16. Phrases often used to signify time on either side of a date or event:
a. "within 2 days after" indicates a period from the date of the event until 2 days after the event.
b. "not later than 2 days after" does not indicate a period, only a latest date. If an advice must not be dated prior to a specific date, the credit must so state.
c. "at least 2 days before" indicates that something must take place not later than 2 days before an event. There is no limit as to how early it may take place.
d. "within 2 days of" indicates a period 2 days prior to the event until 2 days after the event.
17. The term "within" when used in connection with a date excludes that date in the calculation of the period.
regd

shahriar

Post Reply