Reference of URR in negotiable credit

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
dholat
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:01 pm

Reference of URR in negotiable credit

Post by dholat » Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:39 pm

dear all,

we all know that a credit available by negotiation need not to have any reimbursement instruction. is it then necessary to give a reference to URR in the LC along with the UCP?

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

URR725

Post by picant » Sun Jan 04, 2009 6:55 pm

Hi Pal,

in a L/C available by negotiation is not necessary to indicate a reimboursing bank as the negotiating bank will request the issuing bank to provide cover. However in URR725 art. 2 e Claiming bank, it is indicated "bank which NEGOTIATES " and SWIFT MT740 in field 58 a required : Negotiating Bank (pls check new issue). So , IMHO, this is an opportunity as l/c could be confirmed too and in case of negotiation at XX days it is a common way to obtain reimbursement, specially in l/c issued in a foreign currency for both issuing and negotiating bank.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

great insight

Post by iLC » Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:42 pm

great insight dear picant. i never noticed that. will join u all tomorrow

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

practice vs theory

Post by iLC » Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:57 pm

to answer the original question, there is no requirement for a negotiation lc to have a reference of URR. to be more accurate, even LCs which are available only at the counter of issuing bank need not to have a reference of URR.

dear picant, i have checked the swift book. to be honest, im still to figure out why swift define 58a only as a negotiating bank. there is no reference of nominated bank. anyway, i fully agree with your xx day theory

Post Reply