Beneficiary Can Ask Nominated Bank To Blank Endorse

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
gegeeee
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:50 pm
First Name: Gega CITF, CDCS
Last Name: Topadze
Organization: Bank of Georgia
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia

Blanck endorsed, to the order.

Post by gegeeee » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:25 pm

Hy Guys,

If lc requires Full set B/L to order, blanck endorsed - when beneficiary presents B/L and on the back of the document is not endorsed by shipper and has no hand written is it discrepancy?

As i guess correctly if B/L is - to order of issuing Bank, it doesnot need to be blanck endorsed, it has no reason.

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
abelhoci
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:32 pm
First Name: Majeed
Last Name: Bel
Organization: velan
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: canada

Beneficiary Can Ask Nominated Bank To Blank Endorse

Post by abelhoci » Tue Mar 18, 2014 3:07 am

If the B/L are not blank endorser, that`s certainly a discrepancy. However, the beneficiary can ask the nominated bank to endorse them on his behalf

cvrkswami
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:50 pm
First Name: Krishnaswami
Last Name: CVR
Organization: Athena Solutions
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

blank endorsed

Post by cvrkswami » Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:14 pm

Your assumption is right. If the B/L is consigned to the issuing bank, it need not be blank endorsed. However, don't you see the difference, between blank endorsed and consigned to the issuing bank? The issuing bank does not wish to have the responsibility of the consignee and hence sought the B/L to be made to order and blank endorsed. Hence consigning the goods to the isssuing bank you are defeating the purpose. Is it not a discrepancy?

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Ehm Ehm....

Post by picant » Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:11 am

Hi Pal,

I had the same problem, but issuing bank was not obliged to do it. Conflict of interest!
Other comments appreciated
Ciao

iam90
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:32 pm
First Name: allan
Last Name: li
Organization: boc
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: china

I agree with abelhoci,

Post by iam90 » Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:50 am

abelhoci wrote:If the B/L are not blank endorser, that`s certainly a discrepancy. However, the beneficiary can ask the nominated bank to endorse them on his behalf
according to ISBP E13, WHEN a b/l is issued to order of to order of the shipper, it is not be endorsed by the shipper(beneficiary). the endorsement can be made another entity for or on behalf of the shipper.

User avatar
gegeeee
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:50 pm
First Name: Gega CITF, CDCS
Last Name: Topadze
Organization: Bank of Georgia
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia

Beneficiary Can Ask Nominated Bank To Blank Endorse

Post by gegeeee » Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:52 pm

iam90,

E13 tells us:

When a bill of lading is issued “to order” or “to order of the shipper”, it is to be endorsed by the shipper.
An endorsement may be made by a named entity other than the shipper, provided the endorsement is
made for [or on behalf of] the shipper.


It is to be and not "it is not be".

Post Reply