LC Says Charge Are On Beneficiary & Exclude Related Article

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
mohan15082
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:16 pm
First Name: MD. MOHIN
Last Name: UDDIN
Organization: AB BANK LTD
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: BANGLADESH

LC Says Charge Are On Beneficiary & Exclude Related Article

Post by mohan15082 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:42 pm

if a credit state that Advising bank charge, negotiating charge,reimbursement bank charge are on beneficiary and exclude the related article of UCP600.
Than, who is responsible for non collecting charge of those bank.

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Art 37

Post by picant » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:45 pm

Hi Pal,

if the advising bank receives a l/c stating that art 37 UCP is exlcuded, may seek for an amendment or accept the risk for
the advisibg commissions, normally not so big!!!
Ciao

thutrang9591
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 10:30 pm
First Name: Trang
Last Name: Le
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Vietnam

charges

Post by thutrang9591 » Sun Jan 04, 2015 9:31 pm

mohan15082 wrote:if a credit state that Advising bank charge, negotiating charge,reimbursement bank charge are on beneficiary and exclude the related article of UCP600.
Than, who is responsible for non collecting charge of those bank.
I think bank has their own way to protect their right such as not give ben. details of amendment if they do not pay the charges. In case of Reim. and Nego., the charges can be deducted directly from proceeds.

Post Reply