endorsement on the reverse side of the credit

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
berry
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:36 pm

endorsement on the reverse side of the credit

Post by berry » Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:30 pm

i often find LCs which says that the nominated bank must endorse on the reverse side of the original letter of credit. if a LC is presented to a bank which is not a nominated bank, is that bank bound by this clause? is a nominated bank bound by this clause. can the nominated bank forward the document without endorsing on the reverse side of the document?

dholat
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:01 pm

nominated bank is not bound but

Post by dholat » Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:16 pm

the clause is written for a nominated bank. so in no way the presenting bank which is not a nominated bank is bound by the clause. if a presentation is made to a bank which is not a nominated bank, then the issuing bank should inquire with the nominated bank to ensure that no other presentation is made. personally i would not depend on the declaration of the bank that is not a nominated bank. in fact it is as good as a direct presentation. asking a nominated bank to endorse on the back of the original letter of credit is like adding an additional job to a bank which acts on its nomination. a nomination does not bind a bank. hence this endorse thing has no reason to bind the nominated bank.

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Swift Standard book category 7

Post by picant » Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:05 pm

Hi Pals,

Swift stated in the MT700 Usage Rules that, in case of freely negotiable L/C, the advising bank must insert in the advice "....that negotiating bank must endorse the presentation amount on the reverse .......", So IMHO, this refers only to freely negotiable l/c "Available with any bank by negotiation". However UCP 600 allow l/c by payment, def. payment and acceptance to be "Available with any bank" and Swift has not yet changed these Usage Rules.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

binds nobody

Post by shahriar » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:38 pm

i usually insert these clauses as "instruction to negotiating bank". since these clauses are not the part of the credit and does not affect the undertaking of the issuing bank towards the beneficiary, i think i doesnt bind any party.

490519
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:52 am

endosement on the reserve side of the credit

Post by 490519 » Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:40 pm

if the credit specify a nominated bank and the documents presented to another bank then there is no commitment to this bank to endorse any presentation on the reserve side of the l/c . the only obligation to the issuing bank is to ensurse that there is no any presentation done at the end of the nominated bank

Post Reply