Does The Bill Of Lading Requires On Board Notation?

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
khratha
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:44 pm
First Name: Ratha
Last Name: Nhem
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Cambodia
Contact:

Does The Bill Of Lading Requires On Board Notation?

Post by khratha » Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:01 am

Dear ALL

LC required:
Port of Loading: Hong Kong Port
Port of Discharge: Sihanouk VIlle Port

Bill of Lading presented with the following information.
Place of receipt: Hong Kong Port , Precarriage: Acee Tra
Port of Loading: Hong Kong Port, Vessel.....(not mention vessel)
Port of Discharge: Sihanouk ville port
On the body of BL show Mother vessel name Evas Tra

Please kindly help clarify the corrected issue of BL and explain whether the BL need on board notation.

Best regards
KHRATHA

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Bill of lading

Post by picant » Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:59 am

Hi Pal,

IMHO, an on board notation indicating the mother vessel name, a date and port of loading will be necessary to make the b/l acceptable.
Other comments appreciated
Ciao

tituisrt
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 5:04 pm
First Name: mahiuddin
Last Name: titu
Organization: Self
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

BL

Post by tituisrt » Thu Jan 29, 2015 3:03 pm

hi,
As there is an indication of Pre-Carriage the B/L Must contain an on board notation with port of loading and a named vessel .
for more details see ISBP-745 E6.
thanks

haribargava
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:34 pm

bill of lading

Post by haribargava » Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:05 pm

Hi ,

For Onboard notation the below article has to be complied with:-
"indicate that the goods have been shipped on board a named vessel at the port of loading stated in the credit by .."

Now here the vessel (on the body of the B/L) Should clearly identify that it refers to port of loading as stated in the credit.

If you cannot make a reference to this then this is not acceptable.

IJTUDU
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:25 pm
First Name: ISAAC
Last Name: TUDU
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: INDIA

A dated on board notation is required

Post by IJTUDU » Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:32 pm

A dated on board notation is required with name of the vessel and port of loading as there is an indication of a means of pre-carriage in BL.
Regards,

Isaac Tudu

User avatar
harlanadinata
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 7:23 am
First Name: ADINATA
Last Name: HARLAN
Organization: BNI 46
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: INDONESIA

Pre carriage on BL

Post by harlanadinata » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:52 pm

Hi,

Whenever BL indicates pre carriage, there must sate on board notation complete with the vessel name and port of loading stated in credit _ISBP 745 E6.c

mano
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:07 am
First Name: ahmed
Last Name: rabea
Organization: societe generale
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Egypt

on board notation

Post by mano » Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:18 pm

hello,

according to 2010 guidance paper ICC 470/1128 on 'on board notation' which now is incorporated in ISBP745
the matter of on board notation related to our case is evolving about the existence of pre-carriage mean either vessel/truck or others in most cases in a pre-carriage or place of receipt field, there must be an on board notation with port of loading stated in the credit, vessel leaving this port and on board date.

Regards
A.rabie

Post Reply