Hi all.
The L/C mention Port of Origin: Antwerp, the incoterm is CIF and B/L requested marked freight prepaid.
The B/L presented mentions Freight payable at Antwerp.
My question is, it is acceptable marked freight payable at antwerp instead of marked freight prepaid?
Freight Payable at Origin vs Freight Prepaid
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:45 am
- First Name: ILYAS
- Last Name: K.
- Organization: BANK
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: TURKEY
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:18 pm
- First Name: rakesh
- Last Name: chandran
- Organization: bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: india
Freight Payable at Origin vs Freight Prepaid
hi gubaz
friend thats wrong it is CIF antwerp.. freight has to be paid by benef
secondly when its freight prepaid clause in LC ,B/L cannot show freight payable at a place
its a Discrepancy.
friend thats wrong it is CIF antwerp.. freight has to be paid by benef
secondly when its freight prepaid clause in LC ,B/L cannot show freight payable at a place
its a Discrepancy.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 7:56 am
- First Name: RAHUL
- Last Name: CHANDRAN
- Organization: BANK
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: INDIA
Freight Payable at Origin vs Freight Prepaid
if lc mentions CIF antwerp and freight prepaid
CIF-Cost of Freight(antwerp)
B/L should show the same details freight payable at antwerp is a discrepancy.
CIF-Cost of Freight(antwerp)
B/L should show the same details freight payable at antwerp is a discrepancy.