Designated issuing party in AWB need to indicate name of car

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
ching
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:54 pm

Designated issuing party in AWB need to indicate name of car

Post by ching » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:00 pm

Dear Sir,

I would like to obtain your kind opinion.

If L/C required an air transport documents issued by ABC Logistics Ltd.

AWB issued and signed by ABC Logistics Ltd on the column of "Signature of Issuing Carrier or its agent".

Is this already fulfilled L/C requirement and no need to indicatie name of carrier and capacity of signer while AWB's issuing / signing party are as per L/C? If yes, is there any ICC opinion to be supported?

If not, what should be discrepancy -- Not clearly indicate the name of carrier and/or capacity of signer?

Hope to share with you.

Thanks.
Ching

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

My opinion

Post by picant » Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:26 pm

Hi Pal,

IMHO, if an AWB in box AIRWAYBILL ISSUED states BY XYZ, and in in box SIGNATURE OF ISSUING CARRIER OR ITS AGENT indicates XYZ, it is a qualified CARRIER air way bill and must be accepted, as a bank clerk could not have an uptodate experience in other fields. However there are, so called, educational in DC Insight Revue. i.e. volume 1 no 4 autumn 1995, pag. 10. I will try tomorrow to scan it and post i for a general knowledge.

Ciao

ching
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:54 pm

Designated issuer in AWB need to indicate name of car

Post by ching » Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:31 am

Dear Ciao,

Thanks to you.

That means if AWB issuer is made extactly as per L/C required. AWB no more need to identify the name of Carrier and its capacity? Issuing bank has no ground to refuse the documents? Is this also applied to B/L issuer?

Thanks for your sharing.

Regards,
Ching

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Some thoughts

Post by cristiand969 » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:23 pm

If an AWB indicates it is issued by XYZ by using its letterheads (top right corner) and then in box SIGNATURE OF ISSUING CARRIER OR ITS AGENT indicates XYZ only without naming the actual function I would not accept such a document as it does not clearly show the capacity of the signer and I cannot reply only on the assumptions that It would be the carrier.
However, it is a practice that AWB is filled in the box named First Carrier (somewhere in left columns above the name of airports) with the actual name of the carrier and hence to comply with UCP.
Regards
Cristian

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

the AWB is discrepant

Post by shahriar » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:56 pm

in my opinion, the AWB is discrepant. the term signatures of the issuing carrier or its agent does not clearly shows whether abc is agent or the carrier.

Post Reply