Dear Sir,
will a signature in the following format on a charter part bill of lading acceptable?
---------------------------
ABC shipping line, as agent of the master
the name of the master, owner and charter is not mentioned on the bill of lading
signing a charter party bill of lading under article 22
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:58 am
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 5:19 pm
if it would include "for or on behave"!!
every thing for beeing acceptable is OK except "for or on behave" before Master because the ABC shiping line should have signed for or on behave of the Master.meanwhile missing of the name of Master is not problem because according to Art. 22 name of the Master is not required to be mentioned.
hassan
hassan
- shahriar
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
- First Name: Shahriar
- Last Name: Masum
- Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Bangladesh
signing a charter party bill of lading
to me the bill of lading is perfectly signed. "For", "On behalf of", "As agent of" all indicate that the one party is signing for another and therefore any of them is acceptable.
-
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Compliant
Such format would comply with art.22a.i of UCP (a NAMED agent) and with art.118 b of ISBP (In this event the name of the master NEED NOT be stated)
regards
Cristian
regards
Cristian
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 5:19 pm
for or on behave of
Dear shahriar,
the phrases "for" , " on behave of " and " as agent of "from our personal viewpoint can have same meaning.in this case I agree with you but in checking documents we have to do it based on UCP only but not our viewpoint , so to me according to UCP Art. 22 exsisting for or on behave is required.
thank you
hassan
the phrases "for" , " on behave of " and " as agent of "from our personal viewpoint can have same meaning.in this case I agree with you but in checking documents we have to do it based on UCP only but not our viewpoint , so to me according to UCP Art. 22 exsisting for or on behave is required.
thank you
hassan