Article 26 (a)
Transport document must not indicate that goods are or will be loaded on deck. A Clause on a transport document stating that the goods may be loaded on deck is acceptable.
Will you please explain us difference in above with example for understand precisely.
Article 26 (a)
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:08 am
Transfer LC - Shipment Documents
Dear All,
In LC - Applicant - ABC India while Beneficiary -XYX Dubai
It has transferred to another beneficiary - PQR Bahrain.
I need to know how shipment documents will prepared.
Invoice
B/L
Certificate of Origin
Packing List
Insurance Documents.
In LC - Applicant - ABC India while Beneficiary -XYX Dubai
It has transferred to another beneficiary - PQR Bahrain.
I need to know how shipment documents will prepared.
Invoice
B/L
Certificate of Origin
Packing List
Insurance Documents.
Last edited by mando@vsnl.net on Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm
shipped on deck
dear mando,
first of all, you posted two questions in one post. i think it would be helpful to answer if there were in different posts. anyway, answer to your first question here -
the article is quite self explanatory. in many bill of lading, especially the charter party one, there is often a pre printed clause stating that the goods may be loaded on deck. this is just a standard clause. for example right now im having a look at a bill of lading which shows "(of which -------- on deck at shipper's risk; the carrier not being responsible for loss or damage however arising)
this is a standard clause and not a discrepancy. but if the blank space shows "all" or similar, then it would be discrepant.
first of all, you posted two questions in one post. i think it would be helpful to answer if there were in different posts. anyway, answer to your first question here -
the article is quite self explanatory. in many bill of lading, especially the charter party one, there is often a pre printed clause stating that the goods may be loaded on deck. this is just a standard clause. for example right now im having a look at a bill of lading which shows "(of which -------- on deck at shipper's risk; the carrier not being responsible for loss or damage however arising)
this is a standard clause and not a discrepancy. but if the blank space shows "all" or similar, then it would be discrepant.
-
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm
re:Transfer LC - Shipment Documents
totally confused with one. the port of discharge is of the beneficiary's location :!: doesnt make in sense. besides, in case of a transferred Letter of credit, you cannot change the port of loading and discharge. please check the information again and post it in a new thread.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:08 am
Article 26 (a)
What is reason behind ? Could you elaborate same.iLC wrote:dear mando,
first of all, you posted two questions in one post. i think it would be helpful to answer if there were in different posts. anyway, answer to your first question here -
the article is quite self explanatory. in many bill of lading, especially the charter party one, there is often a pre printed clause stating that the goods may be loaded on deck. this is just a standard clause. for example right now im having a look at a bill of lading which shows "(of which -------- on deck at shipper's risk; the carrier not being responsible for loss or damage however arising)
this is a standard clause and not a discrepancy. but if the blank space shows "all" or similar, then it would be discrepant.