preprinted wording and seperate on board notation on BL

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
User avatar
berry
Posts: 329
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:36 pm

preprinted wording and seperate on board notation on BL

Post by berry » Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:23 pm

Dear All,

First of all please help me to under stand what is pre-printed wording. on a bill of lading there are two types of information. one that is added by computer print and another that comes as printed; as original stationary.

everyday i receive various kinds of bill of lading. some quotes "Shipped in apparent good order...." and some show "received for shipment". both of them are as printed form; part of original stationary.

now for received for shipment bill of lading, a separate dated on board notation is required. what do we understand by separate here? has to be an stamp with date? i also see received for shipment bill of lading which has a shipped on board notation as printed by computer printers along with other data. this shipped on board notation is often undated. does it comply the requirement?

roky
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:56 pm

notations

Post by roky » Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:09 am

hi /

the onboard notation which appear at the b/l at the stage of received
can be shown as a stamp with a date
or typed by the computer with a date
or even written with hand written with a date

so this onboad notaion is acceptable ,

pls. be guided accordingly

thanks

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

good question

Post by iLC » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:39 am

to answer your first question,
preprinted wording means those data which are added on the blank paper to create some kind of form; no matter whether they are computer printer or commercially printed. therefore, the data we usually find on the bill of lading; seems to be printed by computer are not the preprinted one.

for a received for shipment bill of lading, you always require a on board notation. it can be either computer printed (printed with other data) or a stamp. and it must be dated. that its for a received for shipment bill of lading, you always have two dates; may be same.

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

pre-printed wording

Post by picant » Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:12 am

Hi Pals,

IMHO, Art 20 a, ii UCP 600 states:
-pre-printed wording (shipped on board in apparent good order and...........Bill of lading)

-an on board notation indicating the date on which the goods have been shipped on board (Received for shipment....Bill of lading + dated on board)

then Art 20 a, iii(remixed)
In case of "shipped on board in apparent good order and......... Bill of lading, if the port of discharge, indicated in L/C , is not inserted in the box "Port of Loading" or it is indicated as "Intended", it is necessary that a notation indicating Port of loading (required by L/C) the date of shipment and the name of the vessel be written, stamped etc, on the bill of lading same.

That's all, but other comments appreciated

Ciao

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

a similar question

Post by shahriar » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:39 pm

a similar question was posed on LCviews which says
Unless the pre-printed "Laden on board..." evidence a date (in which case this date is to be considered as date of shipment), the pre-printed "received for shipment" b/l cannot be accepted.

See ISBP681 - paragraphs 96 and 97.

Best regards,

Bogdan

Ozoda
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:50 pm

"recieved for shipment"

Post by Ozoda » Thu Mar 19, 2009 7:41 pm

In UCP 600 terminology a bill of lading is a port to port transport document - requiring that it is shows that the goods are shipped on board. In that respect "recieved for shipment" is not sufficient.

Post Reply