The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
-
dholat
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:01 pm
Post
by dholat » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:43 pm
i would appreciate your comment on the following bill of lading case.
no where in the bill of lading, the carrier is defined except the signature box which says
signed for the carrier,
pacific international lines
____________________________
(a seal in the box which shows)
pacific international lines
(a small signature here)
As agent
____________________________
to me the bill of lading is not acceptable since the agent does not show on whose behalf it is signing.
-
picant
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm
Post
by picant » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:24 pm
Hi Pals,
I think that it could be appricable the provision of the case dealt in TA625, where a carrier signed as carrier and agent of himself. If it is correspond Bill of lading must be accepted.
Other comments appreciated
Ciao
-
dholat
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:01 pm
Post
by dholat » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:11 am
i agree with you. but here the case is bit different. the agent didnt declare on whose behalf its signing.
-
cristiand969
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Post
by cristiand969 » Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:36 pm
While B/L has different preprinted formats to meet the international transport requirements (including a place for an agent signature and name) it is quite clear that the carrier has signed that B/L and therefore the document is conform.