Dear colleagues,
please help to solve the dilemma: whether the presentation of 2 unsigned certificates of quality with pre-printed indication "Original" met the requirement of l/c ("CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - 2 originals') and is it a discrepancy or not (as per Article 37 of ISBP certificates should be signed).
Thanks in advance.
Vital, Moscow.
Not signed certificate of quality
-
Vital B.
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 6:36 pm
- First Name: Vitali
- Last Name: Baranov
- Organization: JSC 'PSB'
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Not signed certificate of quality
Last edited by Vital B. on Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Judith
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:59 am
Certificates require signature
Para 37 of ISBP clearly states that certificates, by their nature, require a signature. So, unless the document is signed, I would not consider it to be a certificate.
(Also, you might want to check out the varied forms of “signature” as provided in Article 3.)
Hope this helps.
(Also, you might want to check out the varied forms of “signature” as provided in Article 3.)
Hope this helps.
-
shahriar
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
- First Name: Shahriar
- Last Name: Masum
- Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Bangladesh
discrepant
ISBP calls for a certificate depending on its nature. in my opinion a certificate of quality must be signed and therefore the presented one is discrepant.
signature is one of the way to make a document original.
signature is one of the way to make a document original.