"to order" B/L

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
akomolpa
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:04 pm

"to order" B/L

Post by akomolpa » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:40 pm

If LC called for B/L consigned "to order" , but Beneficiary presents B/L consigned "to order of shipper", Is it a discrepancy?

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

no

Post by picant » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:53 pm

Hi Pal,

IMHO, the sentences have the same value.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

User avatar
shahriar
Posts: 923
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
First Name: Shahriar
Last Name: Masum
Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

no discrepancy

Post by shahriar » Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:34 pm

There is no difference between these two. agree with picant. no discrepancy

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

No difference

Post by cristiand969 » Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:13 pm

Provided the B/L in question is duly endorsed by the shipper, the B/L seems OK.

User avatar
loankim
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:29 pm
First Name: Loan
Last Name: Nguyen
Organization: VIB
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Viet Nam

let me know

Post by loankim » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:08 am

Hi,

I also don't treat it as a discrepancy . But i care what is written in its history.
Pls let me know if you have the source. :-)

rgds,

murteza
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 12:59 am
First Name: Syed
Last Name: Murtuza
Organization: BSI
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

TO ORDER B/L

Post by murteza » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:24 am

IT IS DISCREPANCY, UNLESS THE SHIPPER ENDORSE THE B/L.
.
HOPE OF ASSISTANCE .

Post Reply