Article 38k and Force Majeure in UCP600

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
CDCS2009
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 9:06 am
First Name: Nova
Last Name: Birsk
Organization: itrade
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

Article 38k and Force Majeure in UCP600

Post by CDCS2009 » Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:34 am

Hello!!

as per article 38k of UCP600, a second beneficiary must present the document to the transferring bank. if the transferring bank is closed on a regular business day due to a force majure, what is the remedy available to the second beneficiary. can it present the document directly to the issuing bank?
Last edited by CDCS2009 on Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Force majeure

Post by picant » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:41 pm

Hi Pal,

in UCP 600 Commentary is written ref art 36:
The second paragraph relates to the effect on a presenter when credit expires during the interruption of an issuing or nominated bank's business due to force majeure event.
Such banks will not honour or negotiate upon resumption of their business, under a documentary credit that expired during the period of interruption.
If the documentary credit is restricted to a specific nominated bank, the beneficiary could present directly to the issuing bank if time permits prior to the expiry date or last day for presentation.
---
So, IMHO, if it is possible I will present documents directly to issuing bank, stating that "Action due to Force Majeure" or the like.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

One comment

Post by cristiand969 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:19 pm

picant wrote:Hi Pal,

in UCP 600 Commentary is written ref art 36:
The second paragraph relates to the effect on a presenter when credit expires during the interruption of an issuing or nominated bank's business due to force majeure event.
Such banks will not honour or negotiate upon resumption of their business, under a documentary credit that expired during the period of interruption.
If the documentary credit is restricted to a specific nominated bank, the beneficiary could present directly to the issuing bank if time permits prior to the expiry date or last day for presentation.
---
So, IMHO, if it is possible I will present documents directly to issuing bank, stating that "Action due to Force Majeure" or the like.

Other comments appreciated

Ciao
From the practical perspective more and more tranferring banks (not confirming the credit) state under payment instructions that they will pay after receipt of funds from issuing bank. It follows therefore that transferring bank neither undertake to honor nor to negotiate . In this case I would not consider that art. 36 is applicable for the transferring bank and docs can be sent to issuing bank directly with the mention picant has stated
regards

CDCS2009
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 9:06 am
First Name: Nova
Last Name: Birsk
Organization: itrade
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

one more question

Post by CDCS2009 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:32 am

thank you for your kind asnwers. i have an additional question, a academic one. suppose there a force majeure condition with the transferring bank and document is presented direcly to the issuing bank. what should be the action of the issuing bank? one thing is that it will inquire with the transferring bank. but will there be a option for the first beneficiary to substitute the document at the counter of the issuing bank?

Post Reply