Dear Expert,
May I ask for your opinion of the following :
L/C request :
1. INSPECTION CERT. ISSUED BY MOODY INTERNATIONAL.
2. B/L MARKED FREIGHT PREPAID, SHIPPING MARKS AS PER ORDER
DOCUMENTS PRESENTED :
1. INSPECTION REPORT ISSUED BY MOODY INTERNATIONAL
BEARING A ROUND CHOP (SHOWING MOODY INTERNATIONAL)
PRESENTED.
2. B/L AND OTHER DOCUMENTS SHIPPING MARK SHOWING “N/M”
DISCREPANCY CITED:
1. INSPECTION REPORT I/O SIGNED INSPECTION CERT. PRESENTED.
2. B/L SHOWING SHIPPING MARK NOT AS PER L/C STATED.
Please comment whether discrepancies are valid or not.
Thank you for your assistance.
Regards,
ucp800
shipping mark N/M, Inspection Report bearing round chop
-
ucp800
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:56 pm
- First Name: LEUNG
- Last Name: KING SANG
- Organization: WACHOVIA BANK N.A.
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
-
Bhagirath
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:13 pm
- First Name: Vag
- Last Name: Vaghela
- Organization: Multi
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Discr no. 2
Dear Friend,
my opinion is discrepancy no. 1 with regard to Insu cert is correct.
However, discr no.2 with regard to B/L may not be correct as credit is making reference to another document (order) which can not be considered as part of credit.
Rgds,
my opinion is discrepancy no. 1 with regard to Insu cert is correct.
However, discr no.2 with regard to B/L may not be correct as credit is making reference to another document (order) which can not be considered as part of credit.
Rgds,
-
loankim
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:29 pm
- First Name: Loan
- Last Name: Nguyen
- Organization: VIB
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Viet Nam
No discrepancy
Hi there,
in my opinion :
1. No discrepancy , because:
Acorrding to ISBP para.22, " issued by..." may appear as "signed by..." and a signature can be satisfied by a stamp, symbol ( such as chops ) as per para.39
2. No discrepancy, because :
i think "SHIPPING MARKS AS PER ORDER" isnt a detalied shipping mark. By stating like that imnot sure the purpose of a shipping mark in identification of a box, bag or package will be sufficient. So i think para.34/ ISBP 681 which requires to showi the detail of shipping mark isnt applied here.
im doubt even the truth that this B/L must be checked with requirement stated in the credit in raising a discrepancy like that.
.
Your comments appreciated !
Rgds,
in my opinion :
1. No discrepancy , because:
Acorrding to ISBP para.22, " issued by..." may appear as "signed by..." and a signature can be satisfied by a stamp, symbol ( such as chops ) as per para.39
2. No discrepancy, because :
i think "SHIPPING MARKS AS PER ORDER" isnt a detalied shipping mark. By stating like that imnot sure the purpose of a shipping mark in identification of a box, bag or package will be sufficient. So i think para.34/ ISBP 681 which requires to showi the detail of shipping mark isnt applied here.
im doubt even the truth that this B/L must be checked with requirement stated in the credit in raising a discrepancy like that.
.
Your comments appreciated !
Rgds,
-
iLC
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm
more detail
dear UCP600,
no comment on no. 1 as we need more detail of the document. better attach the document here. just for reference, a report and certificate is not the same thing. please give us the exact LC clause and the document.
no. 2 is not a discrepany in my opinion.
no comment on no. 1 as we need more detail of the document. better attach the document here. just for reference, a report and certificate is not the same thing. please give us the exact LC clause and the document.
no. 2 is not a discrepany in my opinion.