merge of two declaration
-
edilee
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:38 am
- First Name: edilee
- Last Name: cdcs
- Organization: cdcs
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
merge of two declaration
L/C requires two different beneficiary's declaration can it be in one declaration including required informations
-
ozgur murat
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:54 pm
- First Name: Ozgur Murat
- Last Name: TURKMEN
- Organization: STFA Construction
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
re: merge of teo declaration
Dear Edilee,
Yes, it can be in one declaration including required information (unless otherwise stipulated in l/c conidtions) .. (please refer to. ISBP681-item.8)
Regards,
Ozgur Murat
Yes, it can be in one declaration including required information (unless otherwise stipulated in l/c conidtions) .. (please refer to. ISBP681-item.8)
Regards,
Ozgur Murat
-
LCstudent
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:34 pm
- First Name: Kurt
- Last Name: Kehrer
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
merge of two documents
dear experts !
IMHO i do not agree with the comments completely, although the reference to para 42 of ISBP is correct, but I prefer to issue two declarations with related content to match the requirement of the said structure of LC in strict compliance to present ALL documents wished.
why to risk any rejection of docs through opening bank while presenting one combined declaration ?
please post the required content/provision to be shown in the docs.
Other comments appreciated.
rgds LCStudent
IMHO i do not agree with the comments completely, although the reference to para 42 of ISBP is correct, but I prefer to issue two declarations with related content to match the requirement of the said structure of LC in strict compliance to present ALL documents wished.
why to risk any rejection of docs through opening bank while presenting one combined declaration ?
please post the required content/provision to be shown in the docs.
Other comments appreciated.
rgds LCStudent
-
S.Khalili
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:52 am
- First Name: suhail
- Last Name: iqbal
- Organization: UBL
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
disagree with LC student.
IMHO ur answer do not appear to be right lest there was a prohibition in the credit.
-
loankim
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:29 pm
- First Name: Loan
- Last Name: Nguyen
- Organization: VIB
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Viet Nam
para 42- not permit
Hi All,
As far as i can remember, i have read somewhere ... that :
As to theory, the spirit of para 42 doesnt mention to permittance of combined document. Something like that , it is not acceptable for the required content of a shipping certificate cant be shown on the face of a bill of lading, even though you can be ensure abt the mumber of originals or copies that are specified in the credit.
However, in practice i still accept a cert. of quality which inclusives the detail of moisture instead of separate cert. of moisure as well as the quantity of presented docs complied with LC terms.
So, i think firstly, need consider the required content of two those declarations , because para 8 and para 42 cant help us have final decisions easily
other comments appreciated !
rgds,
As far as i can remember, i have read somewhere ... that :
As to theory, the spirit of para 42 doesnt mention to permittance of combined document. Something like that , it is not acceptable for the required content of a shipping certificate cant be shown on the face of a bill of lading, even though you can be ensure abt the mumber of originals or copies that are specified in the credit.
However, in practice i still accept a cert. of quality which inclusives the detail of moisture instead of separate cert. of moisure as well as the quantity of presented docs complied with LC terms.
So, i think firstly, need consider the required content of two those declarations , because para 8 and para 42 cant help us have final decisions easily
other comments appreciated !
rgds,