Page 1 of 1

No Vessel Vs Indented Vessel Under Article 20 Of UCP600

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:15 pm
by shahriar
dear friends,
consider the following two scenario

case 1
1. Port of lading - X
2. Ocean Vessel - intended vessel Y

case 2
1. Port of lading - X
2. Ocean Vessel - ------- (Not mentioned)

how will you consider the two cases in respect of requirement of on board notation?

regd
shahriar

Re: No vessel vs intented vessel under article 20 of UCP600

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:31 pm
by cristiand969
Dear Shahriar,
Case 1: When on board notation contain beside the date of shipment the name of vessel doc is acceptable, see art.20 ii last paragraph. If not, doc is discrepant
Case 2. As long as on board notation gives the name of vessel on which goods have been loaded B/L is conform. it is not mandatory the name of vessel to be quoted in the B/L field 'Vessel' but merely to comply with art.20 ii i.e 'shipped on board a named vessel'
regards
Cristian

Re: No vessel vs intented vessel under article 20 of UCP600

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:02 pm
by shahriar
dear cristian,

thanks for your very nice and precise answer. truly appreciated

regd
shahriar