The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
-
shahriar
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
- First Name: Shahriar
- Last Name: Masum
- Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Bangladesh
Post
by shahriar » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:16 pm
dear friends,
UCP 600
If the bill of lading contains the indication "intended vessel" or similar qualification in relation to the name of the vessel, an on board notation indicating the date of shipment and the name of the actual vessel is required.
what are the possible "similar qualification" here. if a vessel name is not mentioned at all, will be treated as "intended vessel"?
regd
shahriar
-
cristiand969
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Post
by cristiand969 » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:17 pm
As an example of similar qualification I can say " scheduled vessel " , "onward vessel" and the like.
regarding your second question I do not understand your question. If a vessel name is indicated without bearing notations as described above then it is the vessel on which the goods were shipped on board. If the vessel is not stated then BL would not comply with UCP 600.
regards
Cristian
