Article 26 (a)

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
mando@vsnl.net
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:08 am

Article 26 (a)

Post by mando@vsnl.net » Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:32 am

Article 26 (a)
Transport document must not indicate that goods are or will be loaded on deck. A Clause on a transport document stating that the goods may be loaded on deck is acceptable.

Will you please explain us difference in above with example for understand precisely.

mando@vsnl.net
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:08 am

Transfer LC - Shipment Documents

Post by mando@vsnl.net » Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:37 am

Dear All,

In LC - Applicant - ABC India while Beneficiary -XYX Dubai

It has transferred to another beneficiary - PQR Bahrain.

I need to know how shipment documents will prepared.
Invoice
B/L
Certificate of Origin
Packing List
Insurance Documents.
Last edited by mando@vsnl.net on Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

shipped on deck

Post by iLC » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:14 pm

dear mando,

first of all, you posted two questions in one post. i think it would be helpful to answer if there were in different posts. anyway, answer to your first question here -

the article is quite self explanatory. in many bill of lading, especially the charter party one, there is often a pre printed clause stating that the goods may be loaded on deck. this is just a standard clause. for example right now im having a look at a bill of lading which shows "(of which -------- on deck at shipper's risk; the carrier not being responsible for loss or damage however arising)

this is a standard clause and not a discrepancy. but if the blank space shows "all" or similar, then it would be discrepant.

iLC
Posts: 504
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm

re:Transfer LC - Shipment Documents

Post by iLC » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:21 pm

totally confused with one. the port of discharge is of the beneficiary's location :!: doesnt make in sense. besides, in case of a transferred Letter of credit, you cannot change the port of loading and discharge. please check the information again and post it in a new thread.

mando@vsnl.net
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:08 am

Article 26 (a)

Post by mando@vsnl.net » Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:19 pm

iLC wrote:dear mando,

first of all, you posted two questions in one post. i think it would be helpful to answer if there were in different posts. anyway, answer to your first question here -

the article is quite self explanatory. in many bill of lading, especially the charter party one, there is often a pre printed clause stating that the goods may be loaded on deck. this is just a standard clause. for example right now im having a look at a bill of lading which shows "(of which -------- on deck at shipper's risk; the carrier not being responsible for loss or damage however arising)

this is a standard clause and not a discrepancy. but if the blank space shows "all" or similar, then it would be discrepant.
What is reason behind ? Could you elaborate same.

Post Reply