Certificate Origin Shows Part No 12o Instead Of 120

TradeLaporte · Post by **TradeLaporte** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:31 am

Dear Members

Will you call discrepancy a certificate of origin showing goods description part number as 12o instead of 120
LC confirm
Your comments appreciated ot

Anurag · Post by **Anurag** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:56 am

This discrepancy is not valid,There are number of ICC official banking commission opinion are available such as insert of “0” additional or type “o” (Alphabet) instead of “0” (Numerical number) or vessel name typo error should not be considered as discrepancy.

other comments are appreciated.

Brgds

ShikhaAggarwal · Post by **ShikhaAggarwal** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 3:56 pm

Hello,

As per ISBP para no A23) its a clear discrepancy any spelling mistake which is not changing the meaning of a line is acceptable but goods description part number as 12o instead of 120 is conflict of data under sub article 14 (d).

Any other comments appreciated.
Regards
Shikha Aggarwal

Navi · Post by **Navi** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 8:53 pm

If I receive such a document as issuing bank, I do not raise discrepancy as I know it is a typing error and convince my customer.

But if I check documents as confirming bank I do not want to risk payment and request beneficiary to correct it.

gegeeee · Post by **gegeeee** » Fri Jul 04, 2014 5:33 pm

100% agree with Navi.

Best,
Gega

Certificate Origin Shows Part No 12o Instead Of 120

Certificate Origin Shows Part No 12o Instead Of 120

Not valid discrepancy

discrepancy

not to take risk...

Best Approach