Ocean Bill Of Lading Vs Charter Party Bill Of Lading
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:19 pm
I don't understand why there is a distinction between ocean BL and charter BL. The basic difference is that ocean BL is issued by the carrier which is the owner of the vessel while charter BL is issued by the charterer who is not the owner of the vessel.
The rational given as to why bank will hardly accept a charter BL as a collateral for loans or payment under a LC transaction is due to the risk that in the event of any dispute between the charterer and the carrier (carrier in the context of charter BL can be referring to owner of vessel or charterer or sub-charterer, am i right?), under the contract of carriage the carrier can call back the vessel and lay claims on the goods onboard the vessel.
In my opinion, even if a shipper don't charter a vessel but have his cargo shipped by a shipping company, there still exist the risk that the shipping company can lay claims to the goods onboard their vessel in the event of any dispute between shipping company and the shipper. Hence, isn't it same risk as a charter BL?
The rational given as to why bank will hardly accept a charter BL as a collateral for loans or payment under a LC transaction is due to the risk that in the event of any dispute between the charterer and the carrier (carrier in the context of charter BL can be referring to owner of vessel or charterer or sub-charterer, am i right?), under the contract of carriage the carrier can call back the vessel and lay claims on the goods onboard the vessel.
In my opinion, even if a shipper don't charter a vessel but have his cargo shipped by a shipping company, there still exist the risk that the shipping company can lay claims to the goods onboard their vessel in the event of any dispute between shipping company and the shipper. Hence, isn't it same risk as a charter BL?