Does Charter Party B/L Needs To Mention Name Of The Master?
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:00 pm
Dear All,
pls make comment on the following analysis:
Signing of Multimodal Transport Documents :
71(b).
If the master (captain) signs the multimodal transport document, the signature of the master (captain) must be identified as "master" ("captain"). "In this event, the name of the master (captain) need not be stated". [Emphasis Added]
Signing of Bills of Lading:
94 (b). If the master (captain) signs the bill of lading, the signature of the master (captain) must be identified as "master" ("captain"). In this event, "the name of the master (captain) need not be stated."[Emphasis Added]
Signing of Charter Party Bills of Lading
118(a). If the master (captain), charterer or owner signs the charter party bill of lading, the signature of the master (captain), charterer or owner must be identified as "master" ("captain"), "charterer" or "owner".
From the above quote, we can see that in case of sign by a master of CPBL, the line ""the name of the master (captain) need not be stated."[Emphasis Added]" is not stipulated in the ISBP.
What is the implification of it, Does it mean that If a CPBL sign by the master, the name of the master must be mentioned on the document?
Waiting for reply
thanks
nesar
pls make comment on the following analysis:
Signing of Multimodal Transport Documents :
71(b).
If the master (captain) signs the multimodal transport document, the signature of the master (captain) must be identified as "master" ("captain"). "In this event, the name of the master (captain) need not be stated". [Emphasis Added]
Signing of Bills of Lading:
94 (b). If the master (captain) signs the bill of lading, the signature of the master (captain) must be identified as "master" ("captain"). In this event, "the name of the master (captain) need not be stated."[Emphasis Added]
Signing of Charter Party Bills of Lading
118(a). If the master (captain), charterer or owner signs the charter party bill of lading, the signature of the master (captain), charterer or owner must be identified as "master" ("captain"), "charterer" or "owner".
From the above quote, we can see that in case of sign by a master of CPBL, the line ""the name of the master (captain) need not be stated."[Emphasis Added]" is not stipulated in the ISBP.
What is the implification of it, Does it mean that If a CPBL sign by the master, the name of the master must be mentioned on the document?
Waiting for reply
thanks
nesar