Expired Date Of Letter Of Credit

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
eftapasixos
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:03 am
First Name: George
Last Name: mitr
Organization: none
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: greece

Expired Date Of Letter Of Credit

Post by eftapasixos » Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:39 am

Hello to everyone!

Please , if possible help me with the following,

My company that I work at, made an export on September of 2015 using letter of credit. This letter of credit in paricular, set two parts of payment.

The first one, which was the for the 70% of the total value was payable with the presentation of the usual documents such as Bill of lading, Invoice, packing list, some cerificates etc.

The second one, which was for the remain 30%, was to be paid with the presentation of the invoice and a certificate signed by both two companies that declares that the machines have been installed (by my company) and are in excellent operation.

Of course, the 70% was paid as the terms of the LC were fullfilled within the deadlines.

But my issue is that because of our customer's delays (as they did not have their facilities where our macines would be installed ready), the installation of the machines could not be done within the deadlines of the LC (date of expire), but only after a year of it.

More specifically the installation was finished one year after the expiration date of the letter of credit. Of course, our customer recognizes that the delay is because of him and has absolutely no problem to sign the certificate in order for our company to be able to collect the 30% of the total amount.

My question is that will the issuing bank accept the documents that our company will present after one year of the LC's expiration? In this point , I have to underline that the LC does not mention a thing about the date that the beneficiary is obliged to present the second set of the documents in order to collect the remain 30% of the total amount.

Thank you in advance,

abrar
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:52 am
First Name: Abrar
Last Name: Ahmed
Organization: Crown Agents
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

retention payment

Post by abrar » Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:27 pm

1.In order to make a compliant presentation the LC would need to be extended.

2. Or, the LC is not extended and the applicant grants a waiver and authorises payment relating to discrepancy of LC Expired.

3. Or, payment is authorised outside the terms of the LC by the applicant to the bank as a third party payment.

abrar
Posts: 984
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:52 am
First Name: Abrar
Last Name: Ahmed
Organization: Crown Agents
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4

Retention payment

Post by abrar » Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:31 pm

If the beneficiary expects irrevocable payment from the issuing bank (or confirming bank) without contestation it is a given that a compliant presentation is required to be made within LC expiry, even if such presention can only be made well after actual shipment.

eftapasixos
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:03 am
First Name: George
Last Name: mitr
Organization: none
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: greece

Post by eftapasixos » Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:04 am

Thank you for your prompt answers! I think that the only way to procced is to present the documents knowing the fact that the date of lc was expired 1 year ago.. My question is that, will the applicants bank accept the documents (of course after asking the applicant)? OR will reject them despite the fact that the applicant accept them?

User avatar
gegeeee
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:50 pm
First Name: Gega CITF, CDCS
Last Name: Topadze
Organization: Bank of Georgia
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia

Has no obligation

Post by gegeeee » Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:15 pm

As stated in sub-article (b) of 16 iii, the issuing bank may seek a waiver from the applicant; however, it has no obligation to do so. Likewise, if it does, it has no obligation to accept a waiver it receives from the applicant.

Post Reply