ISP 98 - 2.01

With the introduction of Uniform Rules for Documentary Guarantee or URDG 758, the rules for Documentary Guarantee seem to be popular again. It can be imagined from the increasing number of questions that have popped up in recent days. Documentary Guarantee Forum is an effort to develop a platform to discuss these questions.
Post Reply
dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

ISP 98 - 2.01

Post by dinesh2476 » Sun Jun 04, 2017 7:42 am

Dear Experts,

I see the below difference between Acceptance & deferred payment. please provide your opinion on this

2.01 Undertaking to Honour by Issuer and Any Confirmer to Beneficiary

i. by acceptance of a draft drawn by the beneficiary on the issuer, in which case the issuer honours by:
(a) timely accepting the draft; and
(b) thereafter paying the holder of the draft on presentation of the accepted draft on or after its maturity.

ii. by deferred payment of a demand made by the beneficiary on the issuer, in which case the issuer honours by:
(a) timely incurring a deferred payment obligation;
and
(b) thereafter paying at maturity.

Regards
Dinesh Kumar

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Just to answer...

Post by picant » Sun Jun 04, 2017 3:04 pm

Hi Pal,

an accepted draft may be endorsed and presented by bonafide holder on the maturity date or days after depending on local laws.
Deferred payment is an undertaking by issuer and/or confirmer that "at maturity" will effect the due payment, without presentation of any sort of documents.
Others ignored.
Ciao

dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

Re: ISP 98 - 2.01

Post by dinesh2476 » Sat Aug 04, 2018 2:50 pm

Dear Picant,

While i know these terms under commercial LC, what needs to be done and the obligation of the issuer, facing challenge in terms understanding this under standby LC's. I hardly remember standby LC's calling for draft other than usual documents simple demand from the beneficiary claiming failure of the applicant to make payment for the shipped goods and simple Invoice for unpaid Invoice.

Please share some scenario's in which we look for article 2.01

Thanks &Regards
Dinesh Kumar

User avatar
picant
Posts: 2026
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm

Re: ISP 98 - 2.01

Post by picant » Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:15 pm

Hi Pal,

s you probably know ISP98 is not an ICC Product, so not discussed between banks, but only approved under USA moral suasion.
I have copy of the Official Commentary , probably under review, that stated referring to deferred payment
by issuer, the way is the same as per UCP, if no notice of refusal is given in due time the obligation to pay is confirmed even if not declared. Other cases are explicated with details. If you want I can send this chapter, by email, not breaking the copyright, for reviewing. my email picchi.antonio@virgilio.it
ciao

dinesh2476
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:27 pm
First Name: Dinesh Kumar
Last Name: ...
Organization: Chrome
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: PU

ISP 98 - 2.01

Post by dinesh2476 » Tue Jan 29, 2019 11:24 pm

Dear Picant,

can you tell us the standby type that covers draft drawn on issuer?

just share some example the manner standby requires draft?

Regards
Dinesh Kumar

Post Reply