Dear members
LC requires bill of lading straight consigned. Bill of lading missing on board notation and vessel name two vessels mentioned. Is discrepancy the bl do not mention on board date?
Your comments appreciated and provide reference article
LC Requires B/L Without Indication On Board
-
TradeLaporte
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:40 pm
- First Name: ART
- Last Name: TRATADOLIBRE
- Organization: Trade Co
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: United States
-
picant
- Posts: 2026
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:49 pm
Compulsory.....
Hi Pal,
even if straight consigned b/l must be shipped.
art 20 a ii and 21 a ii UCP 600 , if it multimodal and first leg is not by sea on board not necessary.
Ciao
even if straight consigned b/l must be shipped.
art 20 a ii and 21 a ii UCP 600 , if it multimodal and first leg is not by sea on board not necessary.
Ciao
-
cristiand969
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Sligthly extended explanation
Hi,
As Picant indicated, the on board notation and consignee name are two different things
The on board notation is mandatory when first leg of carriage is by sea, namely field 44A (inland place) on swift message does not appear, but only 44E (port of loading)
Even so, giving the fact that B/L indicated two vessels iti is necessary that the onboard notation to bear in addition , the vessel name to which such notation refer
regards
As Picant indicated, the on board notation and consignee name are two different things
The on board notation is mandatory when first leg of carriage is by sea, namely field 44A (inland place) on swift message does not appear, but only 44E (port of loading)
Even so, giving the fact that B/L indicated two vessels iti is necessary that the onboard notation to bear in addition , the vessel name to which such notation refer
regards