UCP 600, article 10 f...
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:31 pm
Dear friends,
.
I usually come across the following situation while advising amendments:
Bank A, issuing bank
Bank B, first advising bank
Bank C (our bank) second advising bank...
.
Bank A send MT707 to Bank B and Bank B advise amendment through mail, post, fax etc to Bank C respectively. While advising, Bank B on its instruction letter adds the folllowing clause: "pls inform us whether amendment accepted or not by beneficiary as soon as possible, in case of not rejecting within 7 days, amendment deemed to be accepted"
UCP 600 10f, says that a provision in an amendment should not include such clauses and will be disregarded. Here, this clause does not belong to the original amendment but the advising bank instructions.
Can the advising bank stipulate such a term while advising amendment or credit?
Thanks and regards....
.
I usually come across the following situation while advising amendments:
Bank A, issuing bank
Bank B, first advising bank
Bank C (our bank) second advising bank...
.
Bank A send MT707 to Bank B and Bank B advise amendment through mail, post, fax etc to Bank C respectively. While advising, Bank B on its instruction letter adds the folllowing clause: "pls inform us whether amendment accepted or not by beneficiary as soon as possible, in case of not rejecting within 7 days, amendment deemed to be accepted"
UCP 600 10f, says that a provision in an amendment should not include such clauses and will be disregarded. Here, this clause does not belong to the original amendment but the advising bank instructions.
Can the advising bank stipulate such a term while advising amendment or credit?
Thanks and regards....