Shipper's certificate

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
MIISLAM
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 7:42 am
First Name: MD IMAMUL
Last Name: Islam
Organization: ONE Bank Ltd
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Chattogram

Shipper's certificate

Post by MIISLAM » Thu May 09, 2019 7:51 am

LC calls for "shipper's certificate regarding responsibilities of the shipper for any shortage if shipper's load and count". Presented certificate of the same signed by shipping company in beneficiary's stationary . Is it comply?

mihillol
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 6:50 pm
First Name: MI
Last Name: Hillol
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Bangladesh

Re: Shipper's certificate

Post by mihillol » Fri May 17, 2019 12:13 pm

If the BL showing notation "shipper's load and count" then no need additional certificate. And it is complied

MIISLAM
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 7:42 am
First Name: MD IMAMUL
Last Name: Islam
Organization: ONE Bank Ltd
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Chattogram

Re: Shipper's certificate

Post by MIISLAM » Fri May 24, 2019 1:49 am

LC calls for the certificate so certificate is mandatory. Question is who can sign the certificate. As LC calls shipper's certificate then shipper (BL indicated shipper name as beneficiary) can sign. But certificate was signed by shipping company. Is it complied?

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: Shipper's certificate

Post by cristiand969 » Fri May 24, 2019 12:01 pm

Obviously, not!
The certificate must be signed and the signor must be as indicated in the L/C: the shipper. Is it only signed by shipping company or by its contents the shipping company agree to become responsible for such shortage? On the latter case it is perhaps the intention of the shipper to place the responsibilities for any shortage on carrier who in fact is liable for apparent shortage of goods when surrendering the same to the consignee. I haven't seen so conditions until now , it seems to be dangerous for the shipper because he cannot control the goods from the time he surrender them to the carrier until goods arrive in consignee's hands.

Post Reply