hi,
while UCP600 insists that any amendment of the letter of credit must be advised though the same channel as that of the LC, why URDG offer a leverage in article 10?
Advising of amendment of Guarantee
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 9:06 am
- First Name: Nova
- Last Name: Birsk
- Organization: itrade
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- shahriar
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 1:03 am
- First Name: Shahriar
- Last Name: Masum
- Organization: Mutual Trust Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Bangladesh
party vs bank
In UCP600, the LC is issued and advise only by the bank. but URDG allows any party (any person or company) to advise a credit. practically any person or business has higher probability to be out of business compared to a bank especially considering the fact that a guarantee often lasts over a long period. hence URDG allows this leverage.
more comments welcome
more comments welcome
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:37 pm
- First Name: Lee
- Last Name: Kai Yin
- Organization: DB
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: Hong Kong
Advising of amendment of Guarantee
Dear Shahriar
Your view makes sense although I am not sure if it is the original intention of the drafters.
One more idea is that BG tends to be secondary payment instructment and negotiation is not covered under URDG758. The role of advising party is more of verifying the genuineness of the BG only.
Any further comments?
Your view makes sense although I am not sure if it is the original intention of the drafters.
One more idea is that BG tends to be secondary payment instructment and negotiation is not covered under URDG758. The role of advising party is more of verifying the genuineness of the BG only.
Any further comments?