Dear All,
Does negotiation involves any risk for the nominated bank? in the days of UCP 500, i used to hear that the nominated bank takes a risk of non payment while negotiating a document and thus earns the negotiation commission. i never agree though since i feel that negotiation is always for a complying presentation and may be without recourse. so there is no such risk involved. therefore negotiation commission is for a early payment and hence closely related to discounting. when i look at the UCP 600, I find it similar to my ideas. whats your opinion?
Does Negotiation Involves Any Risk For The Nominated Bank?
-
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:33 pm
-
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- First Name: Cristian
- Last Name: D.
- Organization: Bank
- Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
- Location: RO
Re: Risk in Negotiation
Dear ILC
Art. 12 a states: Unless a nominated bank is the confirming bank, an authorization to honour or negotiate does not impose any obligation on that nominated bank to honour or negotiate, except when expressly agreed to by that nominated bank and so communicated to the beneficiary.
It goes without saying that negotiating bank will insert in its communication letter to beneficiary that negotiation will be made on recourse basis and the like.... It is for each bank to establish such forms of wording because the negotiation (unless it is a confirming bank) convey no irrevocable undertaking of nominated bank to pay beneficiary.
regards
Cristian
Art. 12 a states: Unless a nominated bank is the confirming bank, an authorization to honour or negotiate does not impose any obligation on that nominated bank to honour or negotiate, except when expressly agreed to by that nominated bank and so communicated to the beneficiary.
It goes without saying that negotiating bank will insert in its communication letter to beneficiary that negotiation will be made on recourse basis and the like.... It is for each bank to establish such forms of wording because the negotiation (unless it is a confirming bank) convey no irrevocable undertaking of nominated bank to pay beneficiary.
regards
Cristian
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:51 am
Re: Risk in Negotiation
I don't think the negotiating bank may face risks if it negotiates to the beneficiary. A case i once read is about whether the negotiating can take the right of recourse to the beneficiary. The negotiating bank examined the documents and found them complying, so it negotiated the documents. When the bank forwarded documents to the issuing bank for reimbursement, the issuing bank refused due to discrepancies. Thus the negotiating bank took the right of recourse to the beneficiary. But the beneficiary declared that it was the bank's fault that he didn't check out the discrepancies. The dispute was raised to ICC banking commission. The final conclusion is this issue is in fact out of the scope of UCP and should be settled down by the local applicable law.
Ofei
Ofei
- berry
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:36 pm
Re: Risk in Negotiation
dear ilc,
in my country, we dont charge commission for a negotiation. rather we charge interest; similar to discounting.
in my country, we dont charge commission for a negotiation. rather we charge interest; similar to discounting.