Bill Of Lading Shows Additional Cost (Fine / Expenses)

The forum is dedicated to all who deals with LCs. Please share your experiences, problems and opinions with us. You are requested to be confined to LC related issues only. Let us together discover the beauty of Letter of Credit. Thank and regards – admin; besttradesolution.com
Post Reply
jmitra
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:16 pm
First Name: jasmit
Last Name: mitra
Organization: bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: India

Bill Of Lading Shows Additional Cost (Fine / Expenses)

Post by jmitra » Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:26 am

dear,

i have received a bill of lading which has the following clause on its face
any fines / additional expenses such as but not limited to container detention charges or port storage incurred at the POD before final transfer to FPD due to improper cargo description or non submission of requested document will be on the account of the cargo
is the bl discrepant?

Navi
Posts: 362
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:17 pm
First Name: Olcay
Last Name: Özcan
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: Turkey

Re: additional costs mentioned on the Bill of lading

Post by Navi » Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:49 pm

Dear jmitra,
.
Is there any term/condition on the LC concerning additional costs to freight on the B/L? If not, the document seem to be acceptable, in my opinion...
.
regrds

cristiand969
Posts: 754
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 pm
First Name: Cristian
Last Name: D.
Organization: Bank
Filter: Two Plus Two =: 4
Location: RO

Re: additional costs mentioned on the Bill of lading

Post by cristiand969 » Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:47 pm

Dear Navi,
My best guess is that such a clause on Bill of lading as iti is structured falls under art. 113 of ISBP .....A reference in the transport document to costs which may be levied as a result of a delay in unloading the goods or after the goods have been unloaded, e.g., costs covering the late return of containers, is not considered to be an indication of additional costs in this context.
I said as structured because reference to applicability of such penalties starts ...
jmitra wrote:at the POD before final transfer to FPD
.
So , unless the delivery terms is a place beyond POD (i.e the condition to be CFR/CIF/DDU a named place being after POD ), this clause does not make document discrepant.
However, i would like to draw the attention that we cannot give a correct answer based on few pieces of a total of event.

Post Reply