Page 1 of 1

Intended Vessel Or Similar Qualification Vs No Vessel Name

Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:16 pm
by shahriar
dear friends,

UCP 600
If the bill of lading contains the indication "intended vessel" or similar qualification in relation to the name of the vessel, an on board notation indicating the date of shipment and the name of the actual vessel is required.
what are the possible "similar qualification" here. if a vessel name is not mentioned at all, will be treated as "intended vessel"?

regd

shahriar

name of vessel

Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:17 pm
by cristiand969
As an example of similar qualification I can say " scheduled vessel " , "onward vessel" and the like.
regarding your second question I do not understand your question. If a vessel name is indicated without bearing notations as described above then it is the vessel on which the goods were shipped on board. If the vessel is not stated then BL would not comply with UCP 600.
regards
Cristian